Saturday 22 February 2014

Questions for UI Designer and Psychology Expert

The following questions are prepared for the meeting with our UI Designer on 24/02/2014. These questions are mainly based on my questions about the project background.

Game Design

Have designed?
  • Yes: description
  • No: how to design
Important features of the game
  1. How to involve both the children and the parents?
    • interest the children to play games with parents (not friends)
    • in prototype
      • team: a child with a parent
      • team mark, group mark
  2. How to support/encourage children's discussion of sensitive issues (with parents)?
    • literature
      • SAFE
        • online game friends
          • anonymous
          • age range
        • family - how to make children feel safe?
  3. Key points in the designer's point of view
Meet the victory conditions
  1. How to reduce stigma surrounding mental health issues?
    “If anxiety was really getting in my way, I would see my doctor to find out what I could do about it.”

UI Design

  1. Confirm the same understanding of the game design
  2. Design for mobile? web page? other devices?
  3. Basic draft and mock up

Draft Project Plan - 1

The following outline is a draft plan for the project. After detailed discussion with my supervisor, the final one will be made before 27/03/2014 (Topic proposal due date).


  1. Background research and requirement analysis
    Jan 3rd ~ Mar 27th (Topic Proposal due)
    1. Background related literature review
      Jan 3rd ~ Jan 6th
    2. Requirement analysis
      Jan 6th ~ Mar 7th
      1. mock up
      2. simple prototype
      3. meeting with UI designer and psychology expert
    3. Scope negotiation and feature selection
      Mar 7th ~ Mar 14th (Topic Registration due)
    4. Formal requirement document and project plan
      Mar 14th ~ Mar 21st
  2. Design
    Mar 31st ~ Apr 25th
    1. System structure
    2. Back end
      1. Detailed software structure design
      2. Data model
    3. Front end?
    4. Development iteration plan
    5. Learn Spring
  3. Development
    Apr 28th ~ Jul 20th, except the exam weeks; 1 week per iteration
    1. Development
    2. Progress report
      May 19th ~ Jun 5th (Progress Report due)
      1. draft
        May 19th ~ May 29th
      2. final
        May 30th ~ Jun 5th
  4. Test and draft thesis
    Jul 21st ~ Oct 10th (Draft Thesis may due on Oct 24th)
    1. Alpha test
      Jul 21st ~ Jul 27th
    2. Inner beta test
      Jul 28th ~ Aug 8th
    3. release and field test
      Aug 11th ~ Oct 10th
    4. draft thesis and wait for test result
      Aug 11th ~ Oct 10th
  5. Data analysis
    Oct 11th ~ Oct 17th
  6. Final thesis
    Oct 17th ~ Nov 6th (Final Thesis may due on Nov 7th)
  7. Presentation
    Nov 7th ~ Nov 13th (Presentation may be on Nov 14th)

Sunday 9 February 2014

System Analysis - 1

This system is based on the meeting with Rafa, and it is only for the prototype.


System Structure


Class Diagram




Background Analysis - 1

This is a very first and basic analysis of the project background, based on the project extract which Rafa sent me. I think more project information and deeper analyses are needed to get a better understanding of the project, and make reasonable plans for both the project and the final thesis.

Project extract from Rafa:
Background and project rationale:
Stronger family relationships are predictive of better mental health, and better support when problems arise[ref]  All families would benefit from new opportunities to connect that work within the realities of modern life.  Cooperative gameplay provides opportunities for bonding and strengthening relationships in an accessible and adaptable way.  More specifically, a meaningful relationship with fathers, or other Significant Male Adults (SMA), are important to adolescent development, while meaningful relationships with offspring are important to fathers.  there are many reasons why parents and adolescents may not get opportunities to connect and open up to each other - especially about emotional or sensitive issues.  Gameplay via pervasive digital devices has the power to provide opportunities by circumventing obstacles like time, place, or the intimidating nature of direct discussion.  Moreover, play is fun practice and players can practice responding to difficult situations in the safe context of a game.
A reluctance to communicate about emotional experience is common among males, and therefore between fathers/SMAs and their children and this reluctance is an obstacle to either group seeking help when they need it [ref]. Opening new lines of communication is one way to tackle this problem, and this is possible through cooperative gameplay and the opportunities for safe and playful sharing and negotiation it provides. A game can tackle the problem intrinsically (see research below) as well as through the careful employment of content and theme.   The gaming environment can also build soco-emotional skills through simulation, modelling and the provision of educational content. Moreover, a game environment can incorporate themes and messages aimed at eroding the stigmas blocking males from seeking help.
The unique affordances of games for connectedness and wellbeing
According to Brand’s (2013) research 96% of 11 to 15 year olds and 85% of 16 to 24 year olds play videogames. Additionally, Australians in their 40s and 50s make up the largest group of new adult gamers with 62% of those aged 36 to 50 (and 39% of over 50) now playing. There is a very clear opportunity to capitalise on young people's passion for videogame play and to build on the growing interest in videogames among older Australians. But it’s not just that games are particularly accessible or popular, it is also that they hold unique potential for promoting wellbeing.
How games can promote psychological wellbeing
Contrary to many popular conceptions, much of the recent research shows a variety of positive impacts of videogame play on both psychological and social wellbeing (see Johnson, Jones, Scholes and Carras, 2013) for a review). Psychological wellbeing can be considered to relate to mood, emotions, thoughts and cognitions, while social wellbeing relates to a person’s ability to make and maintain healthy interactions, relationships and connections with others (Durkin and Barber, 2002; Russoniello et al., 2009).
Przybylski and colleagues (2009) have established, based on self-determination theory, that videogames offer players satisfaction of their need for feelings of competence, autonomy and relatedness. Our own research has confirmed this with an Australian sample (Johnson & Gardner, 2010). Moreover, satisfaction of these needs while playing videogames leads to long lasting improvements in positive affect/mood, post-play energy, life-satisfaction and self-realisation (Przybylski et al., 2009). In a randomised controlled trial with a clinically depressed sample, the positive influences of videogames on mood have been shown to include reduction in tension, anger, depression and fatigue and increase in vigour (Russoniello et al., 2009).
Among school aged boys research is coalescing to show a range of psychological benefits of moderate play. The evidence suggests that those who play showed better outcomes than those who never played on positive school engagement, mental health and self concept. More research is still needed, particularly in the area of games designed specifically to support mental health and wellbeing.
How games can promote social wellbeing
As Granic and colleagues (2013) note, perhaps the biggest change in videogame characteristics over time is the degree to which they encourage social interaction with modern games being pervasively social. Yee (2006) collected data from 30,000 players of massively multi-player online role-playing games and found that some of the strongest motivations for play were related to social wellbeing, specifically: socialising (chatting with and helping others), the desire to form meaningful relationships with others, and deriving satisfaction from teamwork. Durkin and Barber (2002) found that a high proportion of time spent playing was with friends and family. Moreover, they found evidence that videogame play was positively associated with family closeness and social involvement.
Additionally, it seems clear that the social connections made during videogame play carry over into real life. Yee (2006) found that players described their online friendships as comparable to their real life friendships and that play was used to form and extend real life relationships.
How games support the discussion of sensitive issues
Cole and Griffiths found that 40% of participants reported that they would discuss sensitive issues with their online gaming friends that they would not necessarily discuss with their real life friends. There is a clear opportunity to help young men and boys build and maintain their relationship with their parents through cooperative, collaborative and creative play afforded through a digital game experience.
Game design can inform other areas in human-computer interaction
What we learn while designing mobile games that promote mental health can be incorporated into other Positive Computing applications (Calvo & Peters, to appear) such as social networks and collaboration software.
Impact
The project will impact the mental health of boys and men in the following ways:
  • Stronger relationships and increased connectedness between adolescents and fathers/SMAs.
    Victory condition: That players report the experience made them feel closer to their teammate and/or that they know more about each other. eg. “I learned a lot about my dad.”
  • Increased socio-emotional skills derived from novel father-son interactions, structured cooperative play experiences and the negotiation and diverse forms of communication practice that come with these.
    Victory condition: That players report feeling more comfortable talking about a wider range of issues. 
    eg. “I feel like I can talk to my son about sensitive issues more easily now”
  • Reduced stigma surrounding mental health issues and around help-seeking achieved through exposure to related scenarios, educational information embedded in gameplay, and simulated experience responding to these issues.  
    Victory condition: That players describe mental health issues as equivalent to any other health issue. That they demonstrate knowledge of prevention strategies and confidence to seek help.  
    eg. “If anxiety was really getting in my way, I would see my doctor to find out what I could do about it.”
  • Contribution to research and practice in games for social impact.  While the project is designed to have an immediate impact on those who participate, it will also contribute new knowledge for future work in the use of mobile games as a platform for health promotion and social impact.  Lessons learned will be disseminated via research and trade publications.




Problems

Moreover, they found evidence that videogame play was positively associated with family closeness and social involvement.
  • family closeness → How to make it?
    • Not so doomed: computer game play and positive adolescent development, Kevin Durkin, Bonnie Barber
    • adolescents in naturalistic environments reported higher arousal and more positive subjective states during computer game play, especially when the activity was undertaken in the company of friends or parents.
    • how? → induce parents to play this game with adolescents
Cole and Griffiths found that 40% of participants reported that they would discuss sensitive issues with their online gaming friends that they would not necessarily discuss with their real life friends.
  • also works for families? if not, how to make it work for families?
    • Social Interactions in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Gamers, HELENA COLE, and MARK D. GRIFFITHS
      • an outlet to safely discuss serious matters
      • One of the advantages of online friendships is anonymity
      • while online, some people self-disclose or act out more frequently or intensely than they would in person
      • age range of players
    • families → no anonymity → how to make it work for families?
Victory condition: That players report feeling more comfortable talking about a wider range of issues. eg. “I feel like I can talk to my son about sensitive issues more easily now”

  • How to make it? 
Victory condition: That players describe mental health issues as equivalent to any other health issue. That they demonstrate knowledge of prevention strategies and confidence to seek help.  
eg. “If anxiety was really getting in my way, I would see my doctor to find out what I could do about it.”

  • How to make it? 




Getting Started

This blog is for my thesis project in the unit of ELEC5222/3 Dissertation A/B, which will start soon in the final year of my MPE (Software) study. I will post my ideas, designs, problems and progresses of the project in this blog.

The project's purpose is to help users build stronger family relationships by playing games, so that the users have better opportunities of getting/giving mental support from/to their family. This project will require skills of Android programming, web programming, etc. Psychological knowledge would also be helpful, especially when working on the thesis.